Skip to main content
Read about

Access to Effective Mental Health Treatment: Remote Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Shows Promise

Effective Mental Health Treatment
On this page
Tooltip Icon.
Written by Andrew Le, MD.
Medically reviewed by
Last updated June 18, 2024

Try our free symptom checker

Get a thorough self-assessment before your visit to the doctor.

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), a well-known psychotherapy method effective for various mental and physical health issues, has traditionally been administered in-person. However, as remote healthcare options expand, therapist-guided remote CBT has emerged, offering potential for broader access without compromising care quality. A comprehensive study comparing the effectiveness of remote and in-person CBT is shedding light on their equivalence, particularly pertinent for regions like Canada, where geographical sprawl poses challenges in accessing mental healthcare.

The systematic review, conducted by researchers Sara Zandieh MSc, MA, and her colleagues, analyzed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved adults with various clinical conditions randomized to either remote CBT—such as teleconferencing or videoconferencing—or in-person CBT. Moderate certainty evidence indicated little to no difference in effectiveness between the two delivery methods across various mental health and somatic disorders. This finding remained consistent regardless of clinical condition, follow-up length, or whether CBT was group or individual.

In Canada, only Saskatchewan and Ontario have set precedents by subsidizing remote CBT. Considering the moderate-certainty evidence that remote CBT is as impactful as its in-person counterpart, the inclusion of remote CMBT in public healthcare funding could facilitate better access to evidence-based mental health care across the country. This would be particularly beneficial for individuals living in remote or rural areas, who are at an elevated risk for mental health challenges and chronic pain.

The study's comprehensive nature is attributed to its multi-language approach and involvement of clinical experts. While the generalizability of the results may be subject to debate due to the demographics of the participants and the medium follow-up duration, the implications for policy are clear. With remote CBT, there's an opportunity to address critical barriers to mental healthcare.

Readers interested in the full text of this groundbreaking study can access it at the CMAJ's official website or follow the article's citation: CMAJ 2024 March 18;196:E327-40. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230274.

As the conversation around accessible mental healthcare continues, this article pinpoints remote CBT as a possibly transformative approach to meet the pressing needs of populations traditionally underserved in mental health care. For more information on health-related topics and help with a range of conditions, visit Buoy Health, to leverage their expertise.

Share your story
Once your story receives approval from our editors, it will exist on Buoy as a helpful resource for others who may experience something similar.
The stories shared below are not written by Buoy employees. Buoy does not endorse any of the information in these stories. Whenever you have questions or concerns about a medical condition, you should always contact your doctor or a healthcare provider.
Jeff brings to Buoy over 20 years of clinical experience as a physician assistant in urgent care and internal medicine. He also has extensive experience in healthcare administration, most recently as developer and director of an urgent care center. While completing his doctorate in Health Sciences at A.T. Still University, Jeff studied population health, healthcare systems, and evidence-based medi...
Read full bio

Was this article helpful?

Tooltip Icon.

References

Zandieh, S., Abdollahzadeh, S. M., Sadeghirad, B., Wang, L., McCabe, R. E., Yao, L., Inness, B. E., Pathak, A., Couban, R. J., Crandon, H., Torabiardakani, K., Bieling, P., & Busse, J. W. (2024). Therapist-guided remote versus in-person cognitive behavioural therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. CMAJ, 196(10), E327-E340. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.230274